Recently, the Guangzhou financial allocation, “75,240,000 yuan ‘support’ authority nursery,” the news spread rapidly on the network and caused much controversy users. Some netizens believe that organ Kindergarten enrollment for the object of “specialty” and “closed” by the public finances to “support” is not rational. More Internet users called for in the national government to increase investment in pre-school education, be sure to pay attention to equitable distribution, not to create new educational inequities.

For the rumors and controversy on the network, Xinhua News Agency, “China Network in” reporter for a related investigation.

Survey: 8 Kindergarten financial institutions of up to 83.49 million yuan allocated

Widely circulated online for the “75.24 million yuan,” the figure, the reporter found that in 2012, Guangzhou City, the department budget, the eight agencies received budget funds nursery also more than this number, in fact, 83,498,200 yuan.

Fourth session of Guangzhou People’s Congress submitted to a meeting to consider the “department of Guangzhou City in 2012 draft budget” shows, the Guangzhou municipal authority nursery general budget funds 5.1352 million yuan, the city government kindergartens 6.168 million yuan, Human Resources and Social Office in the first kindergarten and first two kindergartens points and 24.89 million yuan was 27.42 million yuan, 3.3408 million yuan Department of Cultural Affairs kindergartens, nursery 4.7664 million yuan Financial Bureau, Department of Education-owned subsidiary of Guangzhou Normal School Kindergarten children received 11.2455 million yuan, at least the Guangzhou Port Authority Kindergarten for 525,900 yuan.

Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Finance and Budget Director Zhou Shaoqing explained to reporters, authorities enjoy financial allocation nursery on the premise that their “business unit properties.” At present, Guangzhou authorities complement the Kindergarten core part of the fiscal institutions, according to China’s financial system, the Budget will give a certain amount of subsidies, which enjoy financial subsidies and other institutions is the same, so the budget itself is not inappropriate.

There are users of Guangzhou authorities to calculate the number of kindergarten children “out of every two or three million children a year to use.” In this regard, Zhou Shaoqing said department budget funds allocated mainly for serving officers, retired personnel expenses, utility expenses, vehicle expenses.

According to data disclosed by the Guangzhou Municipal Bureau of Education, 2012, pre-school special fund of 3.05 billion yuan. Pre-charge of Education, deputy director of the Yangtze River in Guangzhou City, the East on the 10th to accept the “Network in China,” said the reporter, the department budget appropriations and special funds is not “a plate.” “8,000 million is fiscal mouth, and 305 million yuan out of the mouth of education, eight more than ten million not included in the special fund of 300 million. Special funds mainly invest in Guangzhou district (county) construction of kindergartens, device configuration, and teacher training, etc.. ”

Doubt: the financial support of the authorities whom service of the nursery?

Kindergarten to enjoy the financial allocation authority caused so much controversy reason is because these objects Kindergarten enrollment “special” mainly for the children for organs.

Served as a state-owned enterprises in Guangzhou kindergarten run by the Guangzhou People’s Congress Yexue Wen said that as the authority nursery institutions, the financial arrangements to fund the law, but “with the public finance kindergartens, it should be for the public enrollment, if not, it is questionable rationality. ”

As students enter kindergarten age is still small, so most of the children have chosen to “the nearest school.” According to reporter investigation, eight kindergartens, mostly in the respective organs of the internal organs of the compound, while in child care are mostly office workers children.

However, non-children of civil servants is not completely “shut out.” According to reporter investigation, authorities generally give priority to their respective authorities nursery staff needs of young children, more than a degree open to community children. However, non-agency personnel must not only care, find opportunities, but also a lot of money to pay the “sponsorship fee”, this figure is generally in 3 million to 6 million range.

Guangdong CPPCC Wu Tan Wei said that although the authorities enjoy high financial subsidies in Kindergarten historical issues, but to enjoy the financial allocation since it is all taxpayer money spent, then the nursery should not be only a few people enjoy, should not be a “father fight, fight relations, fight money” arena, we must show it to the whole community to share.

Deputy director of Guangzhou Education Bureau, said the Yangtze River East, Pratt & Whitney is the inevitable trend of transformation of institutions nursery. In 2011, Guangzhou has been the focal point for all nursery education department of management, the current education sector has started nursery and the original ownership of these institutions to communicate and coordinate, so that authority nursery open to the public as soon as possible.

View: Do not create new pre-school education into the injustices

Past two years, “the park is difficult,” “your park” has become the livelihood issues of social concern, from central to local levels of government are clearly pre-school education to increase investment. Guangzhou City in 2011 introduced the “pre-three-year action plan” to give pre-financial year special fund of 2 billion, and this year this figure increased up to 50%. Secretary for Education, Guangzhou, Qu guard said, according to the Action Plan, the future financial investment will be based on the existing substantial growth.

Is constantly bigger “cake” will be how to allocate it? There are concerns on behalf of members, if you still continue the existing financial system and the office park mode, then a large number of private kindergartens in the allocation of financial investment will remain at a disadvantage. As a result, the more increase the pre-investment, widening the more high-quality public kindergartens and private kindergartens, the gap between ordinary and cause greater injustice?

Koto said that currently, public kindergartens in Guangzhou only 17% of the total number of kindergartens. Pratt & Whitney in the construction of kindergartens in Guangzhou is still a relatively large defects, Guangzhou plans to use three times the number of the Pratt & Whitney Park, the proportion increased to 50%.

Deputy Director of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education Zhuchao Hua said, “inclusive” concept consists of three levels: First, for the general public; second is affordable; Third, educational standards, quality assurance. Guangdong to encourage the main office parks and office parks diversity in forms, conditional enterprises can hold inclusive kindergarten.

According to the Guangdong Provincial CPPCC Wu Han, Wu Tam’s survey data, Guangdong Province, to enjoy the full budget and funding gap of about 410 kindergarten, accounting for only 4% of the total in Guangzhou was similar. Qu Sentinel frankly, more than 1,500 kindergartens in Guangzhou, enjoy the financial allocations of public kindergartens less than 10%.

Guangzhou’s three-year action plan set a target that by 2013, the Public Garden and the ratio of 3:7 private garden. Qu Sentinel said that the future of financial investment into new office will be run kindergarten and kindergarten teaching facilities and security infrastructure improvement.

Tan Wei Wu said, occupy a considerable number of non-public kindergartens should also enjoy the financial benefits. Zhuhai in Guangdong and other areas, the government has begun to reach a certain standard to give a certain number of private kindergartens financial support, I hope this approach in a province-wide promotion.

Ye Xuewen that private kindergartens have to bear the social responsibility of providing pre-school education, but the Government should bear the public service can not be passed on. Public finances should not just “icing on the cake,” so that public kindergartens, “good enough”, but as an ordinary private kindergartens should be “timely”, so that all children can enjoy, and thus truly Pratt & Whitney-type pre-school education.